If you are a fish, your fins are obviously critical for making a living. Fins provide a long list of essential functions, from generation of movement to stabilization, turning, stopping, and dynamic lift (to name a few). Yet only select families of fish—namely trouts and salmons and catfishes—possess a small nub-like fin behind their dorsal fin and before their caudal (tail) fin. This fin is called the adipose fin*, and while many fisheries biologist and fishermen know what it is, explanations have been few and far between when it comes to the function of the adipose fin.
|Diagram of fish fins, including the adipose fin. (Source: L.A. Walford)|
*Because the adipose fin is not rayed and appears as a unsupported finlet, one early hypothesis was that the fin stored fat, or adipose tissue. Studies have generally confirmed that the fin does not hold adipose, yet the name stuck.
Naturally, a proposed ‘non-functional’ fin was too much for some biologists to take, and experiments were designed. In 2004, two authors published a paper that took a first step in establishing the importance of the adipose fin. Reimchen and Temple removed the adipose fin from a set of juvenile steelhead and compared their swimming abilities to similar steelhead whose adipose fin remained attached. They found an 8% increase (on average) in caudal fin amplitude (i.e. work) in the fish without the adipose fin. Although they didn’t get into the mechanisms of how the fin possibly increases swimming efficiency, they did suggest that the adipose fin may create vortices that impact the caudal fin, or the fin may serve as a pre-caudal sensor to flow.
|Close-up of adipose fin on salmonid species. (Source)|
As a natural extension of their fin-clipping comparisons, Temple and Reimchen followed up in 2008 by investigating catfish, another fish group exhibiting an adipose fin. This time they consider 1906 catfish species, and compared the presence of the adipose fin to the habitat in which the species lived. They found that for species in moving waters (streams and rivers), an adipose fin was more often present than for species in low-flow environments, such as lakes. Although the specifics of how the fin might work were still unsubscribed, this work was critical toward supporting the notion of the adipose fin as a sensory organ.
|The catfish (here, flathead) is another group of fish exhibiting an adipose fin, particular for those species in moving waters. (Source: Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency)|
And most recently, Buckland-Nicks and coauthors in 2012 began to articulate the how. This work reported that indeed the adipose fin was innervated (connected to the nervous system). The authors called the adipose fin a “precaudal flow sensor” allowing improved maneuverability in turbulent waters. And while other studies failed to demonstrate swimming performance differences in clipped and unclipped fish, the authors note that at least three of these studies took place in non-turbulent waters. Of course, this also fits with the catfish results from Temple and Reimchen.
So why the concerns with the loss of the adipose fin? Turns out that clipping this ‘non-functional’ fin has been routine for fisheries management agencies for decades. Surely, millions of adipose fins have been removed from fish! Simply snipping this small fin provides a permanent marker as to whether the fish (when caught later) is a naturally-produced individual or a stocked individual.
|Comparison of stocked and wild salmon, based on presence of adipose fin. (Source)|
Perhaps the benefit of adipose fin clipping through the information retrieved at the time of (re)capture outweighs the cost of a marginal decrease in swimming ability. And remember, the adipose fin swimming benefit is conferred only in turbulent waters—so we can’t assume that all stocked fish swim around at a constant disadvantage. (And of course, other differences between stocked and wild fish many swamp any impact of the adipose fin, but we’ll save that comparison for a later date.) So although we have made great strides in understanding the function of the adipose fin, the impacts of adipose clipping on stocked fish remain unknown.
Do you have an opinion on clipping the adipose fin? Please let us know in the comments below!
22 Comments Add yours
Cool post Steve, thanks. Here's an interesting excerpt from a 1940s study report I recently came across where fins were removed as marks… can you imagine doing this today — all lower fins removed?!
“The dwarf suckers used in this study at no time exhibited any unusual behavior as regards their equilibrium. In fact those minus all five lower fins appeared to maintain their poise equally as well as individuals having the full complement of fins. Since only one fin was removed each year, except in cases where partial regeneration occurred, it is possible that the fish learned to compensate for the loss in each instance. Perhaps if more than one, or all, of the lower fins had been removed at the same time the effect would have been vastly different. It is believed that the loss of even five fins did not create a serious handicap; otherwise the number of returns would not have been so great. Physically handicapped fishes, of course, are more vulnerable to capture by predators, than normal individuals; therefore it is believed that losses of marked fish would increase in direct proportion to the number of removed fins. Actually this was the case, but there was no means of determining whether or not the marked fish suffered proportionately higher losses than unmarked fish. Perhaps the losses of marked fish were entirely normal. The fact remains, however, that 36.3 percent of all the fish marked during the five-year study period managed to obtain all the necessities of life and, in addition, return on one or more occasions to participate in spawning activities. A considerable number accomplished this feat for five successive years and still appeared to be equally as healthy as unmarked individuals.
The loss of fins from outward appearances neither discouraged the suckers from completing the spawning nor prevented them from surmounting the various obstructions and swift currents to reach their objective. Male dwarf suckers demonstrated that their fins are non-essential in making contact with females during the sex act. In fact those with several missing fins accomplished the act without any noticeable lack of efficiency.”
They should find another way to identify stocked fish
Thanks, Dave. Those poor fish! I guess optimistically we can call the recent work “progress” from previous butchering methods, even if we are still snipping a small fin.
Characins also have a adipose fin. Again many of them (including the mighty Hydrocynus and Salminus ) inhabit sometimes turbulent water. Interesting hypothesis, love your blog!
Perhap[s the edipose fin has a role in mating success. Or. perjahaps it is a useless relic like the human spleen.
Well, I’ve been wondering why, when I cook mullet (gutted) in the microwave in water, the second smaller dorsal fin attachment point consistantly explodes, always just under that fin. I don’t know if it is considered an adipose fin, but I wondered if there may be either fat or a bladder like accumulation of air there. Perhaps for attitude control? Like an elevator on an airplane?
Black mullet, referred to in the immediately preceeding.
Great info! I’m a fish and wildlife student and am going to be writing a 20 page report on adipose fins. Thanks for the general data. I’ll report back if I find any data that can either confirm or refute the hypotheses here.
Maybe the adipose fin is a “data gathering organ” taking in important information about the river: flows, droughts, salinity, waterfalls, habitats…. etc… it is now known that salmon quickly evolve to their constantly changing environment, so much so, that salmon running up and spawning during a drought year will have babies that will grow up and return at a slightly different time to compensate for the drought.
Another possibility is that the adipose could be a navigational instrument, sensing temperature and “scent” from thousands of miles away…. ever wonder why hatchery fish are so dumb? Maybe it’s because their adipose fins are cut off… and those catfish… are They migratory? Just saying…. humans are dumb, (make em swim faster?? Haha that’s a laugh, give nature more credit)
See: Noltie, D. B. (1987). Sex and Year Comparisons of Lake Superior Pink Salmon ( Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) Adipose Fins. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 13(3), 272-278. This documents sexual dimorphism in adipose fin dimensions in spawning pink salmon in the Great Lakes, and provides an hypothesis for its adaptive significance for salmonids . Terry Beacham had found it previously on the West Coast. Notions of adipose fin adaptive significance in other species should probably also factor in considerations of why such dimorphism occurs (if it does). dbn
Follow the money!!!
Hatchery fish=Farmed fish. Who cares if they are less likely to survive (just release a few more)? Its better than not knowing if you are whacking a “wild” fish or hatchery fish.
Many smaller hatcheries are in operation for species conservation. That is, not all hatcheries are producing fish to be caught by commercial or recreational fishermen. So, it is ideal if these hatchery fish could survive so that they could return to spawn and try to create a sustainable population.
I know that wild trout seam to fight harder than stocked – I am sometimes surprised at how a small a wild trout is after feeling the fight it produced – maybe the adipose fin has something to do with this
We just toured the fish ladder at Whitehorse, Yukon (June 20, 2017). They remove the adipose find on their hatchery fish for identification. Some years the returning fish are a higher percentage of hatchery born.
So I was off to clip adipose fins on salmon smolts at a hatchery when I read this–to clip or not to clip–that is the question.
It wouldn’t be there if it didn’t have a purpose. Evolution works and the adipose fin wouldn’t be there if it didn’t serve a purpose .
If it appears naturally on the fish why do arogant humans feel the need to target it as strange and so get rid of it?🧜🏾♂️
To help preserve the wild fish population. Often times it is illegal to keep fish with an adipose fin because they are wild. It is helpful for identifying what fish to keep and what to release.
The adipose fin was put on a fish by our Creator. Genetic variety is in the DNA by design.
Alaskan salmon sometimes encounter vary turbulent rivers. If it gives a fish an advantage it is a good fin. Fish on.
Hello I’m new here and I am from WA State. I have lived in Chico on the Dye’s inlet for my entire life and watch the salmon every year. Depending on where you’re at on their journey, it can be VERY different experiences when watching the salmon. Some areas are sometimes as narrow as 3 feet wide and a foot deep where they are fin to fin at times jolting passed each other. The further you go in closer to their spawning pool, the less “spectacular” and visually captivating it becomes for many. I’ve grown up with these guys all my life and as of a few years ago I’ve began to walk up further down the trail to their pool to watch, it’s a hard. The closer they get, the more tired and rotten their bodies become. It’s true that many look like zombie fish. Well, it’s the end of October so this morning I went out for the first time this year to my spot down from their spawning pool and had my one on one tine with nature. Although the circle of life must go on, before it speeds up, sometimes it slows down… Near their end on the final stretch they rot alive and many die. You whiteness barely lifeless salmon swimming through a maze of it’s dead and alive rotting neighbors, yet they never give up. I had always thought that they stopped feeding completely on their run up the stream and i did a little Google search and found this Article on the mystery of the fin. I didn’t even know that this was a mystery and scientists/researchers didn’t know what it’s used for. But anyways, I’ll share here and hopefully this reaches whoever is in confusion. When the salmon are nearly at their spawning pools and they are on the brink of death, they become cannibals and they eat at the other’s adipose fins. You’ll see occasionally one biting off or napping at another salmons adipose fin that’s weaker and closer to death. It’s hard to watch. They eat at each other while they are alive. I’ve seen this happen over the years and I don’t know if they ever eat at the dead, I’ve only seen living eat at the living, buts it’s always the back fins. If you ever see a spawning pool, at the least the one near my home, it’s laid with rotting dead salmon coprses with missing back fins. All for the newborns.
I don’t know what other purpose this fin would have. From my eyes I see it as a fin stored with fat on wild salmon that’s essentially a fast and easy energy snack for it’s friend to have that is just about to make it, but can’t without a little energy.
Anyways, I hope that this reaches the community. Would you let your friend eat your hand right before you died so that he could continue his bloodline? I’d say that it would be the noble and right thing to do. Nature naturally functions that way in animals I’d suppose. Salmon are some of the most amazing creatures on earth.
Come on down to Chico if you want to see for yourself. Cheers!
I’d like to just add, that clipping this fin in fisheries is damaging to their life cycle. That clipped fin could have saved another salmon. Whoever is reading this please tell them to stop.